Mix System VS Powerful PTLE System

What are your thoughts on the processing power of PTLE 6.0 software (which will be Altivec and DP aware) running on a new Mac DP 1gig or 1.25 gig machine VS. a Mix or Mix Plus system? I have seen several post where guys with Mix (1 card) systems did not have hardly any DSP power with 32 tracks. This makes me think that an 001 might be more powerful in a new DP Mac and the new PTLE software. Here are my goals: - 24 to 32 tracks - EQ and Comps on all tracks (waves) - 4 or more additional effect inserts - 4 or more auxes, 2 being verbs What type of mix system would it take to run this? I know that PTLE systems are getting close to this and should be easy to do when the new 6.0 PTLE software comes out. If a PTLE system IS more powerfull in DSP than a Mix or Mix Plus system, what other reasons would there be to move "up" to a Mix system. The only obvious ones to me are more I/O and some sync capabilities....anything else? Thanks.

"Powerful LE" is an oxymoron.

I believe PT v6.0 has key command mode as well as some midi groove template things, but no beat detective as I recall.

you are using a D8B and a HUI with PTLE 001??? why not just the D8B and 001, the Hui almost seems like a hell of a lot of overlap. (though it does have exclusive controls which the D8b does not. but still...???

Dump the D8B and with the money get a Mix+ with an 888/24. Thats my advice. You will never regret it. Native audio is a fine idea but the reaity of it doesn't live up to the hype. All those theoretical instanciations of plugins wont seem that great when you deal with slow downs of hardware, when every time they upgrade the software your computer gets relatively slower and slower and more feeble until you have to get another one, of re-configuring the OS and the hardware buffers to do different things. It'll drive you crazy.

I'll explain my system in a little more detail: I have a D8B/HDR set up as my main tracking system. I also have 3 ADATS BRC to do transfers. I got the Digi001 and Waves bundle to do 1. editing and mastering 2. small demos 3. to learn the PT system 4. have a way to transfer files to my main system. For this it has worked great. However, I have tried to do some tracking and mixing with the PTLE system but it is not powerful enough. This is why I asked the original question about PTLE 6.0 and new DP G4's. As far as getting rid of my D8B.........I don't think so.....what type of PT Rig would it take to have 48 channels of EQ/Comp/De-es/Gate, 12 auxes and 16 additional plugins all running at the same time, plus 24 faders and 56 analog inputs at 24 bits as well as AES/SPDIF I/O's? Just the inputs alone would take 7 888/24 and to hook those up you need 4 cards or a "MIX4" system (this is what I gathered from looking at the MIX site) which cost 2X or 3X as much as my whole system! This is why I did not purchase a MIX system last year, just didn't make $$$ sense. However you can get a MIX system for $2,500 (1 card and PT 5.0-6.0) and an ADAT/24 I/O for $650. So for $3,150 I can get into a MIX system. BUT, will it have LESS DSP power than the new PTLE 6.0 system on DP G4.....that is the question.

I have to agree with Jason B. I, too, have been a long-time TDM user, but the writing will eventually be on the wall. My $50k system at work is nearly shadowed by my host 001 at home....at a tenth of the price. The only real differences, thus far, are track counts and latency, but within a few years these'll be non-issues. Lack of SMPTE is a bummer, but there're ways to skin a cat. Granted, TDM still "feels" more solid than RTAS, but, again, host speeds and latency will continue to close the gap, especially once OSX and PT6 develop further. YMMV Rick