Thoughts about a new IVTC algorithm » Broadband » Forum
Forum

Forum



ПоискПоиск   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 19.03.2025 - 12:06:21
Pages:  1  

Thoughts about a new IVTC algorithm

Advertising

/
AuthorMessage

Olka_tim

users




Statistics:
Messages: 2239
Registration: 28.03.2008

This idea just happened to pop into my head a while ago, so I thought maybe I'd share it. I'm not a coder, so I don't know where this idea is any good or not. Maybe it might would be usefull for detecting those interlaced mouths in anime or something... Anyways, couldn't it be possible to detect interlaced frames by first blending the fields, then comparing this to the original frame? The non-interlaced parts of the image would stay mostly the same, while the interlaced areas would change a good bit. Depending on the ammount of change it detects, perhaps it could find interlaced areas?

---------------------
ТА АЛЛЮР, пр.Д.Яворницкого, 107А, 0504806144 0% СП Косметики Разработка и наполнение сайтов на Битрикс, ImageCMS, Opencart. Разработка мобильных приложений.
Message # 1 21.06.20 - 16:48:46
RE: Thoughts about a new IVTC algorithm

offear

users




Statistics:
Messages: 68
Registration: 12.02.2012

sorry for being OT but hey zarxrax, I didnt know you were a member here :D

---------------------
Message # 2 21.06.20 - 16:55:57
RE: Thoughts about a new IVTC algorithm

omtaretutta

users




Statistics:
Messages: 5
Registration: 08.04.2010

Your idea is not clear because if you blend two fields, you still have a field. How can you then compare that to a frame? These are the ways I know of to detect combed areas: 1. Interframe comparison. Compare pixel to corresponding pixel in the previous frame. If the difference exceeds threshold, it's "moving" and should be deinterlaced. 2. Interfield comparison 1. Compare the pixel to the "corresponding" pixel in the other field. If the difference exceeds threshold, it's "moving" and should be deinterlaced. 3. Interfield comparison 2. Actually look for combing by making a detector that looks for spatial frequency of 2 pixels, e.g., Gunnar Thalin's approach that he calls area-based, and which I adapted from him and called field differencing. Please explain your idea more fully and clearly. Thank you.

---------------------
Message # 3 21.06.20 - 17:06:00
RE: Thoughts about a new IVTC algorithm

dawid13w

users




Statistics:
Messages: 17
Registration: 10 wrz 2006, 19:42

@Zarxrax You didn't tell us how you made the blended frame, but I have to guess you just used the VirtualDub internal deinterlace set to blend (or an equivalent thereof). But then differencing that against the original frame is going to produce output everywhere, because the blended frame is basically just the original with a vertical blur. This is going to be useless for detecting combing, as I confirmed by actually differencing the two sample frames using Avisynth Subtract().

---------------------
Message # 4 21.06.20 - 17:12:17
RE: Thoughts about a new IVTC algorithm

Vedji

users




Statistics:
Messages: 8
Registration: 11.11.2011

Ok, I guess it was just a pointless idea then :)

---------------------
Message # 5 21.06.20 - 17:16:37
RE: Thoughts about a new IVTC algorithm
Cam Belt : Previous topicNext topic: loading a effects chain with multiple tracks
Pages:  1  

The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants